Archive for September, 2010

The Narrow and Wide Paths

Sunday, September 26th, 2010

In this week’s Sunday morning talk, Richard Miles explored God’s command to us to choose the ‘narrow’ path, but also reminded us how easily we can arrive on the ‘wide’ path.

Listen to this podcast (or download – right click here and ‘Save as’):

 

References:

The Big Issue: Welcome to the Pope?

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

Notes on “The Big Issue” Session 1 – 21 September  2010

Listen to this podcast (or download – right click here and ‘Save as’):

 

In September 2010 the Pope, the head of the entire Roman Catholic Church worldwide visited Britain for the first ever state visit by a Pope. How should we view such a visit?

First of all a few caveats…

Distinguish between the “…..ics”  and the “….ism

This is not a paper  on the subject of Roman Catholics. There are many wonderful Roman Catholics whose godliness would put many of us to shame, who are born again, filled with the Spirit and who love Jesus. We would discuss for hours many good things about Roman Catholics. What we want to consider today is Roman Catholicism as a belief system and as an established church. This is much the same as if we were discussing atheism – we would not spend our time – except incidentally – discussing atheists.  Our subject would be atheism

Avoid prejudice

Many people, especially of an older generation and in certain parts of the world have had a deep inbuilt hatred of all things Roman Catholic inbred into them. If that exists amongst us, we need to discard it. We must have an objective, Biblical view about Roman Catholicism, one built on facts, not on prejudice.

Avoid sentimentality

On the other hand, if we have had a good experience of Roman Catholics this must not blind us either! Often the kind of comment that is made is something like: “I knew a Catholic priest and he was a lovely man….” This may be true but it does not help us with an objective view of Roman Catholicism.

Recognise the diversity within Catholicism

Within Roman Catholicism there is huge diversity, from a very traditional deeply sacramental approach, to a view of Christianity that has much in common with evangelicalism. The latter have almost discarded traditional Catholic dogma, yet remained within the Catholic Church. So it is tempting to think that some are OK and some are not. But what we have to do is to look at the doctrines held by all Roman Catholics, and decide whether we can, in all conscience, accept these as Christian beliefs.

Recognise that most Catholics haven’t a clue what their church believes!

Most Roman Catholics love the practices of their church, without having a clue about what many of the doctrines actually are. This means that, if we come to the conclusion that some of the teachings are wrong, we cannot charge many Catholics with error as they don’t know what it is that they believe!

Points of Agreement

There are some fundamental points on which those who believe the Bible agree wholeheartedly with what Roman Catholicism teaches. Amongst them are:

The person of Jesus

One of the marks of cults is that they are ambiguous about the person of Jesus. Jehovah’s witnesses, Mormons and the other cults –as well as non-Christian religions such as Judaism and Islam – all say that whoever Jesus was, He was not God and Man. Both Biblical Christianity AND Roman Catholicism affirm that Jesus is God and is also man.

The Trinity

Biblical Christianity clearly has the Trinity – one God in three persons – clearly defined as a basis of faith. Again Catholicism affirms this quite clearly.

The Historical record

Again, both Roman Catholicism and Biblical Christianity affirm the historicity of the Biblical record. Roman Catholicism clearly affirms the virgin birth, crucifixion, the resurrection and the ascension of Jesus

On the basis of the agreement between Catholicism and Biblical Christianity on both the above points Roman Catholicism (whatever other differences we may have with it) show itself to be different from the corruptions of Christianity normally referred to as cults.

The Crucial Issues

However, notwithstanding the above, there are four matters on which we have to put Roman Catholicism up against the spotlight of God’s word, to see whether or not we can, as Bible believers, accept Roman Catholicism as a genuine and legitimate expression of Christianity.

There are four crucial issues we will consider here:

The question of truth

The issue here is: how do you and I and any church determine what is true and what is not?

“Sola Scriptura” – the reformers were very clear. God is truth and he has communicated his truth to us in language. God’s truth is therefore that which is in the Bible, the revealed, inspired and authoritative word of God. Anything in addition to this is unreliable, and Scripture can only be interpreted by other Scripture. It stands on its own and there is no authority higher than it. The motto “sola scriptura”means “only scripture”. That is the position of all who are Biblical Christians today.

The Bible plus……is the mark of all corruptions of Christianity

What all corruptions of Christianity have in common is that they rely on the Bible…plus something else. It is the “something else” which is the danger. So the Jehovah’s witnesses use the Bible, as interpreted by the teachings of the Watchtower society. The Mormons add the book of Mormon.

Any “Christian” group has to be assessed by how it determines truth. What is the authority in the case of the Roman Catholic Church?

Catholicism….truth  is the Bible plus

The infallibility of the Pope – the Pope has the authority to declare truth himself, when he pronounces infallibly, thus putting his own authority above that of Scripture. (Incidentally, he has only done so twice – once to affirm the doctrine of papal infallibility and once –  incredibly –  to affirm the doctrine of the assumption of the Virgin Mary – these are the only two occasions on which the Pope has spoken infallibly!)

The inerrancy of the church. Roman Catholic doctrine is that the Church of Rome cannot deceive or be deceived in its teaching.

In other words…according to the Catholic church,  truth is whatever they say it is is! This teaching ultimately makes the Catholic Church, with the Pope as its head, the arbiter of truth. Not the Holy Spirit, not the word of God – but the word of the Roman Catholic Church.  This is completely unacceptable for Bible believing Christian and runs counter to the teaching of Jesus, his apostles and the word of God. In this respect, the Roman Catholic Church places itself in the same position as one of the cults.

The Question of Salvation

To say this is a crucial question is putting it mildly. How does someone come to be saved from their sins, forgiven by God and spend eternity with Jesus in heaven?

The issue is very clear. In Biblical Christianity we are saved by faith in Christ alone, apart from the works of the law. In every religion other than Biblical Christianity, in order to be acceptable to God there have to be works to make yourself good enough. The contrast is stark. Where does Roman Catholicism sit?

The position is quite clear: in Roman Catholic teaching, salvation is NOT achieved purely by faith in Christ.It is achieved by a mixture of faith and works, and depends on our own efforts, and the receiving of certain sacramental rites carried out by the church. In other words, the issue that caused the reformation – salvation by faith alone – is still an issue today. Biblical Christianity states that we are saved by faith alone. Roman Catholicism teaches that we are not. This makes the teaching of the Church of Rome unacceptable to Biblical Christians.

The Question of the Atonement

It can appear that we are getting technical here. But the question of the atonement touches every aspect of Christianity. The atonement is the doctrine that teaches that when Jesus died on the cross, he paid the penalty for the sins of those who he has redeemed. Nothing else is required or can be added to the finished work of Calvary. If any group departs from this they are not only guilty of departing from basic Christian beliefs, but we have to say that blasphemy is an appropriate word.

Again one of the marks of false religion and the cults is that it denies that the blood of Christ can pay penalty for sins. What does Rome say?

The position of the Roman Catholic Church is that Christ died for our sins. However we have to dig beneath the surface and see what the practices of the church really say:

In the Mass (the Catholic Communion Service) the Roman Catholic Church teaches that the bread and wine literally become the body and blood of Jesus, and that at Mass, said every day by every priest, Christ is literally being offered for our sins. Here are some extracts from the Roman Catholic Catechism:

# 274 The Blessed Eucharist us not a Sacrament only; it is also a sacrifice

#275 A Sacrifice is the offering of a victim by a priest to god alone…

#277 The Holy Mass is the sacrifice of the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, really present on the altar under the appearance of bread and wine, and offered to God for the living and the dead

#278 The Holy Mass is one and the same sacrifice with that of the Cross who… continues to offer himself…on the altar through the ministry of his priests

#279The sacrifice of the mass is offered…to satisfy God for our sins…

This teaching stands in total opposition to the teaching of the word of God,  that Jesus offered himself for our sins once and for all.

The teaching contradicts the truth that Calvary was a once and for all, never to be repeated sacrifice.

It has to be described as dangerous and blasphemous

But it doesn’t end there….

The Roman Catholic doctrine of Purgatory teaches that when an individual dies he may well have to be purified from his sins in purgatory before he is fit to go to heaven. Again, this stands in total opposition to the truth that the blood of Jesus purifies us from all sin.

In the matter of the atonement the Roman Catholic Church has to be seen to be dangerously opposed to Biblical Christianity.

The Question of Worship

Biblical Christianity teaches that we should worship the one only true God. Roman Catholicism teaches this also. However the practices of the church are very different….

Here are a couple of prayers offered to the Virgin Mary:

“Hail Holy Queen, Mother of Mercy. Hail our life our sweetness and our hope. To thee do we cry poor banished children of Eve. To thee do we send up our sighs, mourning and weeping in this valley of tears. Turn then , most gracious advocate, thine eyes of mercy towards us and after this, our exile show us the blessed fruit of thy womb….O clement, O loving, O sweet virgin Mary”

And

“We fly to thy protection, O Holy Mother of God. Despise not our petitions in our necessities, but deliver us always from all dangers O glorious and blessed virgin.”

And

“Hail Mary full of Grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou amongst women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.  Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray  for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.”

No one reading these prayers could come to any conclusion other than that worship of the Virgin Mary as the Holy Mother of God is advocated by the Roman Catholic Church.

We have looked at four areas of Roman Catholic doctrine that depart from Biblical Christianity on matters that are fundamental and critical. Each of these taken on their own would make it impossible for a Bible- believing Christian to endorse the Roman Catholic Church.

Taken together, we have to conclude that Roman Catholicism, sadly, is not a legitimate expression of Christianity.

Celebration at Levi’s House

Saturday, September 18th, 2010

Listen to this podcast (or download – right click here and ‘Save as’):

 

Reference: Luke 5 v 27-39

Jesus in in the middle of a busy and exciting time of ministry in his home region of Galilee. As he goes along he comes across a tax collector named Levi.

Our key thought for today is the words of Jesus:

“It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick”.

Imagine visiting your doctor when you are in the full bloom of health! Here Luke draws a contrast for us between people who think that they are healthy spiritually (or who think that they can make themselves acceptable to God) and those who know that they are sick and lost, unless Jesus saves them.

Which one are you?

1. A Personal Call

In the midst of all the business of ministry to the masses Luke makes it clear that Jesus also speaks to people one at a time. We have seen a desperate leper, a group of friends desperate for Jesus to help their friend, the paralytic, and now we see Jesus calling a man who was the most despised amongst men – a tax collector.

Levi, in many ways, had everything going for him. He would have been a highly intelligent, educated man, astute in business and a true Jew. The trouble is that he had collaberated with the Romans and used his gifts to extort money from his fellow-countrymen on behalf of a regime dedicated to subjugating them. His methods did not have to be ethical – as long as he gave the Romans what they asked for he could keep whatever else he made. This meant that tax collectors were usually very rich and totally despised – especially by the religious establishment. The word from the Pharisees would be “have nothing to do with them”. And who does Jesus call? Levi – a tax collector. There is no one who is beyond the reach of the call of God! It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick!

2. A Promising Commencement

It is certainly true that Jesus calls the worst of sinners. But He is not expecting them to stay the same as they are. Jess goes on to say that he has not called the righteous but sinners to repentance.

How does Levi  respond to the call? And how should we respond?

We read that Levi got up, left everything and followed Jesus.

“got up” – to follow Jesus is an active choice.

“left everything” – all the earthly trappings of success had to go”

“And followed..” – the call to follow Jesus is a call to follow a person.

We then read that Levi invites all his friends to meet  Jesus. What a great start to his life of following Jesus!

How should our Christian life start. In David Pawson’s book “the Normal Christian Birth” he highlights four things that must accompany the call to follow Jesus:

Repentance – have I turned from my old life?

Faith – am I trusting in Jesus, rather than my efforts to save me?

Baptism in water – have I obeyed God by being baptised?

Baptism in the Spirit – have I received the gift of the Holy Spirit to empower me to follow Jesus?

We need to make sure that our  lives of following Jesus have started correctly.

3. A Public Celebration

There is a belief that our religion is a personal private matter. Not at all! As soon as Levi understands the reality of Jesus in is life, he has to tell people. And who else is he going to tell, but his friends?  So we have the picture here of Jesus in a “sinner’s” house surrounded by the dregs of society. There is nothing that Jesus loves more – he came to call sinners, not the righteous. Who are you introducing Jesus to?

4. A Predictable Confrontation

Complaint One: Guess who is unhappy about Jesus mixing with the wrong types of people!

Answer: creative irony! If you think you are healthy – I can’t help you! If you are righteous you don’t need me! I am here for the sick and the sinners!

Complaint two: You are eating and drinking – not fasting.

Answer: we are in a new era – an era where God comes to the sinner – not one where we have to make ourselves righteous to come to God.

Jesus uses two short parables to make his point – the parables about the  cloth and the wine. They are both saying the same thing: this is a day for new things – not for the old religion of works. You can’t patch up old things, they have to be made new. It’s no good trying to patch up your life – you need a new start with new cloths and a new wine. And it’s available to sinners – not the righteous. It’s available to the sick – not the healthy!

5. A Painful Comparison

There is a painful comparison between two types of character here. The sinner who eagerly recognises his need of a Saviour, who realises that his life is a mess without God on the one hand. And on the other – the self-righteous person who thinks that his deeds are enough to get him to God. Which are you?

And finally…

Levi was an outcast and a sinner. He had to friends , no popularity and his life was a disgrace in the eyes of God and man. Yes Jesus saved him. And Jesus can save you.

But not only did Jesus save him, Levi – also known as Matthew – was soon to become one of the inner circle of Jesus disciples , and wrote one of the four gospels. Who knows what God can do with the rejects of life, if they turn to God?

Hunger and thirst for righteousness

Sunday, September 12th, 2010

Andrew Parfitt visited us this week and spoke on “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness”. He challenged us to consider whether we had as a priority in our lives  seeking the righteousness of God.

Listen to this podcast (or download – right click here and ‘Save as’):

 

Reference: Matthew 5 v 1-12

Andrew spoke on “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness” and challenged us to consider whether we had as a priority in our lives  seeking the righteousness of God.

Only Knowing Jesus

Sunday, September 5th, 2010

Martin Cooper visited us at PCF again this week and spoke from Philippians 3 about knowing Jesus Christ personally as Lord, and how everything else fades away in comparison to this.

The podcast starts with Malcolm reading Philippians 3 v 1-11.

Listen to this podcast (or download – right click here and ‘Save as’):

 

Reference: Philippians 3 v 1-11